








 |
 |

Trade Show Assessment
NAGASA TRADE SHOW ASSESSMENT
Midwest Graphics
May 20-22, 1999
Minneapolis Convention Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Respondents
|
Total number of NAGASA exhibitors
|
108
|
|
Total number of exhibitors
|
|
|
Respondents to assessment
|
16
|
|
Dealers, distributors and resellers
|
01
|
|
Manufacturers
|
15
|
|
Total Responses
|
16
|
Assessment
Key: High-5 to Low-1
Score
1. Number of local prospects generated
- Local - less than 100 miles 1.7
- Regional – 100 to 300 miles or adjacent
states 1.7
- Nationwide 0.9
- International 0.7
- Sales objective met 1.2
- Ease of set up 3.1
- Ease of tear down 3.3
- Return on show investment 1.4
- Amenities (i.e., member lounge, food) 2.2
- System for recording and retrieving leads 2.3
- Timing and duration of show 2.1
- Price of carpeting, furniture and electrical 2.3
- Cooperation of electricians, riggers & carpenters 2.9
- Fairness of space assignment and choice 2.8
Feedback
- Did you meet your sales objective?
|
Response
|
Number
|
Percent
|
|
Yes
|
03
|
19%
|
|
No
|
11
|
69%
|
|
No Answer
|
02
|
12%
|
|
Total
|
16
|
100%
|
Comments
- Support by PIM & printers very poor
- Low presence of Minneapolis dealers at show
- Insufficient number of printers in attendance
- Traffic was light on Saturday
- Poor prospect attendance
- Will you exhibit at this show next year?
|
Response
|
Number
|
Percent
|
|
Yes
|
03
|
19%
|
|
No
|
10
|
62%
|
|
Undecided
|
03
|
19%
|
|
No Answer
|
00
|
00%
|
|
Total
|
16
|
100%
|
Comments
- Traffic very poor and the overall show was smaller
- Not satisfied with lack of attendance
- Next year it is scheduled during DRUPA and all
our staff will be there
- Schedule during to many other events
- This show doesn’t draw newspapers
- What are your key recommendations to improve this
show overall?
- Better pre-show marketing
- Too close to Gutenberg Festival
- Bad timing
- Minneapolis could support a show that was every
3rd year
- Local shows should be in the same city
- Minneapolis is not a desirable draw
No Additional Comments
Compiled by Rochelle Smith of the NAGASA staff
Back to
Trade Show Assessment
NAGASA © 2001
|