|
Study Focus: Assessment & Direction by
Dealers & Manufacturers
The Means of a True Partnership
Two studies done by NAGASA provide interesting insights into
the relationship between dealers and manufacturers. Surveyed
in 1997, the results are documented in two reports in the NAGASA
Distribution Statistical Series, as well as NAGASA White Papers
8 and 9. Some 76 dealers and 92 manufacturers responded to questionnaires,
which solicited responses to similar questions, and views of
similar issues, from both ends of the channel.
Both studies show that while manufacturers and dealers value
their relationships with one another, both are troubled by various
aspects. Dealers expressed concern about the profitability of
the products they handle, while manufacturers were troubled
by what they see as a lack of loyalty on the part of dealers.
While dealers foresee a future in which they handle the products
of fewer manufacturers, suppliers are concerned about the ability
of dealers to deal with technology products and to represent
them adequately to end users.
Asked What are Most Important Factors Used by Manufacturers
to Judge Them, Dealers Provided the Following Ranking:
1. Ability to increase sales
2. Financial strength and creditworthiness
3. Ability to be a local advocate for the manufacturer
4. Depth and quality of dealer management
5. Ability to service products after the sale
Asked What are Most Important Factors Used to Judge
Dealers, Manufacturers Provided the Following Ranking:
1. Ability to increase sales
2. Willingness to be a local advocate for the product
3. Financial strength and creditworthiness
4. Reputation among printers and trade shops
5. Willingness to invest in sales and service training
|
Only half of the dealers polled take advantage of manufacturer
sales training, and only slightly more than half use cooperative
trade show exhibits as a means of promoting manufacturers’
products. Of course, not all manufacturers offer sales training,
nor do they provide trade show assistance. Still, manufacturers
perceive that dealers, by not taking advantage of the programs
that are offered, are somehow disloyal and indifferent to manufacturers’
needs in the marketplace.
As much as dealers and manufacturers disagree, they agree remarkably
about the most important factor in their relationship: that
the ability to increase sales is used by manufacturers to judge
dealer worthiness. Financial strength and creditworthiness was
ranked second by dealers and third by manufacturers.The willingness
and ability to serve as local advocates for products was ranked
second by manufacturers and third by dealers.
The reputation of the dealer among printers and trade shops,
while ranked fourth by manufacturers, was put in ninth place
by dealers themselves. Dealers, on the other hand, saw depth
and quality of dealer management as the fourth most important
factor in the eyes of manufacturers, while the suppliers put
dealer management seventh on the list. Manufacturers also saw
willingness of dealers to invest in sales and service training
as the fifth most important factor, while dealers viewed it
as seventh.The unfortunate aspect of these answers demonstrates
that manufacturers see dealers as customers and that dealers
see manufacturers as suppliers. Neither side sees the other
as partners. These attitudes must change on the part of both
for the manufacturer-dealer relationship to reach to the next
level -- that of true partnership.
Contact NAGASA for
a free copy of White Papers #8 and #9.
|